logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2014.11.14 2014고단979
유해화학물질관리법위반(환각물질흡입)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 16, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment with prison labor for robbery and injury at the Incheon District Court, and completed the enforcement of the said sentence on July 6, 2012.

On October 1, 2014, from around 21:00 to 23:10 on the same day, the Defendant, at the house room of the Defendant, on C2nd floor in Jinju City, divided the part of the 's flusium' and the part of the 's flusium' 's flusium', which is a hallucinogenic substance, into a flusium, and flusing off the flusium into a flusium, and flusium in the above flusium in a manner of drinkinging the flusium.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. Previous for judgment: Application of criminal history records, inquiry reports, and investigation reports (the confirmation of crimes during the period of repeated crimes)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 58 of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 58 subparagraph 3 and 43 (1) of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act that choose a penalty;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes is that the defendant inhales carbon gas, which is a hallucinogenic substance; the defendant's health is inferior in terms of the risk of preventing other serious crimes in the aftermath of the crime; the defendant has the record of juvenile protective disposition and criminal punishment due to the same crime in the past; the defendant committed the crime in this case during the period of repeated crime due to the previous conviction in the judgment; the defendant was committed at the time of committing the crime; the defendant's wife was doubtful; the defendant's wife was suspected of committing unlawful acts; the defendant's wife was imprisoned; the defendant's wife was pregnant; the defendant's wife was imprisoned by taking into account other favorable circumstances such as character, conduct and environment; the circumstances and results of the crime in this case; and the circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments after the crime.

arrow