1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized by Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-1, 4, 5, 6, 18-1, 2, 19, 20, 1 through 5, and the overall purport of arguments and arguments as a whole.

A. The Plaintiff is a company with the objective of corporate management and marketing consultation, etc., and the Defendant runs the design consulting business, etc. in the trade name of “B”.

B. (1) On October 30, 2009, the Defendant entered into a brand planning service contract between the Defendant and the Chinese company (hereinafter “China company”) with the Modern Liability Company (hereinafter “instant brand planning service contract”) on or around October 30, 2009, to provide the Defendant with the following planning service (hereinafter “instant brand planning service business”) to Chinese company in order to create a female uniforms brand in China, and individually refer to the contents of each service, “(i) business,” and “(ii) business,” and “(iii) business,” and “(iv) business,” respectively, to receive 3.50,000 Chinese company’s brand planning service contract (hereinafter “instant brand planning service contract”).

The planning service cost of this case: ① Market diagnosis and strategic analysis report of women's uniforms market analysis, and ② 70,000,000,000 Chinese sales department store sales strategy, ② store design (SI) Chineseized 40,000,000 SI design (SI) Chineseized 40,000,000 SI design (SI design, 3D and construction drawings) construction supervision at the construction site supervision at the store of 10,00,00,000,00 in the 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.