The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below's scope of the judgment of this court was found not guilty as to assault and damage to property among the facts charged of this case, and found guilty as to each of the facts charged of assault and damage to property, and the part of innocence for which the prosecutor did not appeal as to only the defendant's conviction was determined by the expiration of the period of appeal. Thus, the court below's judgment is to be decided only for the

2. Summary of reasons for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the injury of this part of the facts charged, although the defendant had not inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below, is erroneous in the misapprehension of the facts

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (an amount of two million won) is too unreasonable.

3. Determination

A. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated in the lower court’s judgment as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant may fully recognize the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the lower judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

1) 피고인은 원심 제 2회 공판 기일에 이 사건 상해 범행을 모두 자백하였다가 당 심에 이르러 이 부분 공소사실을 부인하고 있으나, 피고인은 원심에서 변호인의 조력을 받으며 이 사건 상해 범행을 인정한 자백 진술을 당 심에서 번복한 경위에 대하여 납득할 만한 설명을 하지 못하고 있고, 달리 위 자백 진술이 피고인의 진정한 의사에 반하여 행하여 진 것이라고 볼 만한 사정을 전혀 찾아볼 수 없는 점, 피고인이 경찰 조사에서도 ‘ 허리띠를 휘둘러 때렸다’, ‘ 뺨을 1회 때렸다’, ‘ 발로 한번 찼다’ 라는 취지로 이 사건 상해 범행을 일부 자백하는 취지의 진술을 하기도 하였던 점 등에 비추어 보면, 원심 법정에서의...