1. The judgment of the first instance court is modified following the succession participation and the modification of the claim in the trial. A.

The defendant.

1. The following facts may be found either as a dispute between the parties, or as a whole together with the purport of the entire pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 15 through 25 (if there are serial numbers, including their serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Eul evidence Nos. 20:

[1] On June 26, 2006, the Minister of Construction and Transportation (the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs as the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs in February 2008, and the Minister of Construction and Transportation as the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs in succession to the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport in March 2013, but at the time, according to the organization of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation (hereinafter “the Minister of Construction and Transportation”) designated Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, J, K, and branch-gu L workers as the planned district for national rental housing complex pursuant to Article 5 of the Act on Special Measures for the Construction, etc. of National Rental Housing (amended by Act

The Minister of Construction and Transportation (hereinafter "the project district in this case") shall designate the project operator as the Korea National Housing Corporation (the defendant established on October 1, 2009; hereinafter "the defendant shall be referred to as "the defendant"), and publicly notify the designation of the district in which the national rental housing complex was designated and the approval of the implementation plan on January 4, 2007, and the designation of the district in which the national rental housing complex was designated and the approval of the implementation plan were publicly notified on November 9, 2007, respectively.

The Defendant, as a part of the relocation measures for the residents who lost their base of living due to expropriation of their owned houses or land, was incorporated into the instant project district, was specially sold the land for detached houses within the said district to those selected as those subject to the relocation measures.

[2] The plaintiffs and the plaintiff succeeding intervenors each of the above special sale of this case as to each of their own parcel numbers and land indicated in the annexed Table 2 calculation table between the defendant and the defendant on December 2009, and the sale contract between them.