A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was appointed as a police official on July 27, 2012 and from April 3, 2015 to the same year.

9. Until September 1, 200, while serving in the Jeju Western Police Station C, currently serving as the patrol staff of the Jeju Western Police Station D police station.

On July 2015, the Defendant served at Jeju Police Station C, which was organized in accordance with the Jeju District Police Agency for Jeju District Police on July 2015, 2015, to a team exclusively in charge of arresting the winners of the Jeju Police Station in accordance with the "Plan for the Special Arrest of Persons with Major Designations".

1. On July 2015, the Defendant: (a) taken a summary list of 115 persons extracted from the Jeju Western Police Station in 215 to the Jeju Western Police Station in 215 to the Jeju Western Police Station in Do; and (b) three police stations including the Jeju Regional Police Agency (the Jeju Do Office, the Jeju Do Office, and the Western Do Office) designated by the Team E in exclusive charge of arresting the winners at C offices; and (c) received instructions from the foregoing persons to investigate their cell phoness, general telephones, Internet telephones, and family relation certificates by requesting the provision of communication data, through the confirmation of whether they are eligible persons’ cell phoness, general telephones, and whether they have subscribed to Internet telephones, and verification of family relation certificates.

However, even though the Defendant confirmed at the Jeju East Police Station that a warrant of arrest was issued as a crime of fraud was included in the above list of multiple times, the Defendant did not report it to the company and take appropriate measures to the company, and did not make a request for provision of communication data only to the remaining 114 persons except the above G, and did not make any investigation into G, such as not making a request for provision of communication data.

Accordingly, the defendant has deserted his duties without justifiable reasons.

2. Whether a person has been assigned to a criminal investigation agency to divulge confidential information in the course of performing official duties or to a person designated as such by the criminal investigation agency for a violation of the Personal Information Protection Act, such as a person to be disclosed to the outside;