1. The Defendant’s KRW 549,853,483 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from October 18, 2017 to August 12, 2020.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff as a party, etc. is a company engaged in the business of selling, selling, selling, selling oil, etc., and the Defendant is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing, exporting, importing, distributing, storing, and selling petroleum and petrochemicals, including crude oil, natural gas, and ELP.

On the other hand, the Korea Railroad Corporation is a public institution with the aim of contributing to the development of the railroad industry and the national economy by enhancing the expertise and efficiency of railroad operations.

B. (1) On September 1, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Korea Railroad Corporation on September 1, 2015 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”). The land referred to as “the instant land” is collectively referred to as “the instant land,” and all of the land referred to in the following: (a) is located in the said Edong; (b) the land is specified as Dong and its lot number.

(2) On March 24, 2016, a sales contract was concluded with respect to the purchase price of KRW 1,341,646,00, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed. (2) On March 24, 2016, FR site was divided into KRW 400 square meters from D land, and the land category of D and C land remaining after division was changed into a gas station site, and on April 5, 2016, the said D land was merged into C land.

The current status of the instant land following the division, merger, etc. shall be as follows:

After the division, merger, etc., the lot number of land category C is 484m2,340m2 and 400m2,256m2,000 and 400m2,000 for a F Railroad site of 2,256m2.

C. (1) The Plaintiff purchased the instant land from the Korea Railroad Corporation, and newly built one unit of the second neighborhood living facilities and two facilities for storing and treating dangerous substances on the ground (class 4 petroleum (lulux oil). The Plaintiff completed registration of initial ownership on April 7, 2016. (2) As a result, the Plaintiff conducted soil contamination inspection under the Soil Environment Conservation Act, as prescribed by Article 4-2 of the Soil Environment Conservation Act.