Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the person in charge of money exchange to the business owner of "E Gameland" located in literature-si D, and the defendant B is the will of the defendant A.

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, on June 27, 2016, Defendant A established 40 games for “New Game” at the head of the said game room, and around July 2, 2016 from July 2, 2016 to July 8, 2016, when many unspecified customers request to refund points obtained through the use of the game water in the said game room, Defendant A exchanged 10% of the winning points to unspecified customers. Defendant B received 100,000 won from Defendant A, and introduced them to the head of the said game room, and provided coffee or exchanged them to customers upon Defendant A’s request.

The Defendants conspired to engage in the business of exchanging intangible results obtained through the use of game water as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F, G, H, and I;

1. Application documents for change in the name of E Gameland, seizure records, on-site photographs, explanation of game instruments, investigation reports (to the former owner of E Gameland, listening to telephone conversations by J, verification of a contract for the former owner of J telephone, verification of users of L mobile phones, and verification of users of L mobile phones), application of statutes on monthly electric power usage, and copies of each currency content;

1. Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances are considered for the reasons for sentencing) of the suspended sentence

1. Article 48(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act provides for confiscation (Defendant A).