logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.10.20 2015고단2134
특수공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2015, at around 20:15, the Defendant: (a) sent a pedal at the “Ecafeteria” next to the second underground floor D in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, the Defendant: (b) sent the laps to the site after receiving a report by 112; (c) listened to the witness H’s statement; and (d) threatened the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object in the table table; and (d) threatened the head of the above G; and (e) “this farb whose few few feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb fe feb feb by the body of the said G.

Accordingly, the defendant, carrying dangerous objects, interfered with legitimate execution of duties in relation to the handling of police officers' 112 reports and the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to G, I, and H;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to hear statements of persons for reference and H);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and reasons for sentencing under Articles 144 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act for the choice of criminal facts;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended sentence] shall be limited to the case where the aggravated area (1 to 4 years), the aggravated area (1 to 1 year), the collective power or multiple power, or the case where the dangerous objects are carried (1 to 1).

2. The Defendant, who was punished for the crime of violence and obstruction of performance of official duties, was called by a police officer upon receiving a report on a fluence of drinking, and the police officer was clearly aware that the police officer was in the course of performing his/her duties by using his/her uniform, but the police officer carried with dangerous objects and threatened the police officer with the threat of the police officer, and the police officer committed the assault as stated in the judgment of the police officer to have the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the police officer, and argued that the fluence caused by self-injury was assaulted

arrow