Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2015, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding suppression of crime by the victim, such as 2 to 3 times the victim's chest on drinking, while a female under the influence of alcohol at a D restaurant located in Guri-si C, upon receiving a report of 112 and being sent back from one police officer other than F, who was sent back to the E District, was able to take home from the police officer outside the police of the victim, who was able to receive guidance for returning home from one person other than F, and the victim's chest was b to 3 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Making records and reporting of records;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of 112 Case Report Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime related to obstructing the performance of official duties on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifyinging the legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus requires strict punishment to establish the State’s legal order and eradicate the light of the public authority. In particular, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months and one year of suspension of execution on August 29, 2015, by obstructing business operations at the Jung-gu District Court on August 21, 2015 and sentenced to one year of suspension of execution on August 29, 2015, and thus, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the grace period, which is likely

However, in light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case by contingency under the influence of alcohol, punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstances leading to the crime of this case, means and results, circumstances after the crime, detention period, etc.