1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. In the case of an application for confirmation of intention of divorce between the Plaintiff and the Defendant around January 29, 2018, the Plaintiff and the Defendant: (a) the person with parental authority and the custodian over C, a minor child, shall be the Defendant; and (b) the Plaintiff agreed to pay KRW 300,000 per month the child support to the Defendant until he/she reaches the age of majority; or (c) the fact that the record of the child support charge containing the above contents was prepared is either between the parties or can be acknowledged by the statement of evidence A

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion and its determination on this issue are the same as the Defendant agreed with the Defendant to bear the child support for C as it is. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant’s aforementioned assertion should be exempted from the enforcement of the instant protocol, on the ground that it was merely a mere fact that the court officer provided that “the amount of the child support shall not be in official space in the application for confirmation of intention of divorce. A certain amount of the child support must be submitted without fail.”

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.