logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.06.13 2013고정120
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2012, the Defendant became aware of the victim D (the age of 23) in the latter part of the C University located in Chuncheon-si around 00:00, and came to take alcohol before the building in Chuncheon-si.

At around 05:55 on the same day, the Defendant discovered a victim who talks with male-friendly job H in front of the G Beauty room located in Chuncheon City F, and assaulted the victim by breaking his finger by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and H;

1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel by each police statement regarding D

1. The outline of the assertion does not contain an assault against the victim D;

2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of this case, namely, the victim D, from an investigative agency to an investigation agency, consistently stated that the defendant and H had the upper part of the victim's chest part of the victim's chest by one hand, and the defendant stated in detail the circumstance from the beginning of this case to the towing, the defendant's specific act and remarks, etc., and credibility exists. Hdo investigation agency to the extent that the victim was used by the defendant, consistently with this court from the investigation agency to this court, and consistently stated in detail the circumstances leading the victim to the location of this case, the circumstance leading the defendant to the victim, the circumstance leading the victim to the arrival, the circumstance leading the defendant, the defendant's specific act and remarks, etc., and thus, the victim D has credibility. On the other hand, the defendant consistently stated that he did not assault the victim from the investigative agency to this court to this court. However, the defendant knew that the defendant and the victim were drinking with the defendant and the victim at the place of the crime of this case.

arrow