The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (one year and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination: (a) there are favorable sentencing grounds, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, the fact that the defendant is relatively old, and that the amount of damage by each victim is the smallest amount; (b) although the same criminal record was committed six times and the suspended execution was sentenced twice, each of the instant crimes was committed during the suspended execution period; (c) the defendant continuously committed the crime of fraud under the same several laws; (d) the fact that there are many victims and the victim did not recover from damage; and (e) the reason for unfavorable sentencing, such as the defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, the background and motive leading to the crime, and all other matters concerning the sentencing as indicated in the records and changes in the records of this case, the judgment of the court below is judged to be appropriate; and (e) there are no changes in circumstances in addition to the trial of the same party, the defendant

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.