The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable in light of the following factors: (a) the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case; (b) the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim C, or did not recover damage; and (c) the victim F prepared a letter of revocation of the complaint on the premise that the defendant would repay the money by December 5, 2014; (b) the defendant is not able to return the money by deceit until now; (c) the defendant had the same record as the defendant was not returned; and (d) the defendant was committed again without being aware of the fact that he had been under suspension of execution; (d) the court below already determined the punishment by fully taking into account the above circumstances; and (e) there was no change of circumstances that could vary from the judgment of the court below; (e) the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment; (e) the relationship with the victims; and (e) the motive, means, results, and the circumstances after

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.