1. Of the instant lawsuits, the part of the Plaintiffs’ primary claims against Defendant Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Commercial City Development Project approval and public notice - Private City Urban Development Project (hereinafter “instant project”) - G publicly notified on June 28, 2013, and H-project operator announced on July 1, 2013, and H-project operator announced on July 1, 2013: Defendant L&C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “P&C”).

B. The ruling of expropriation made on December 23, 2014 by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): - The sum of 92 obstacles indicated on each of the land and the attached Form 2 (goods) No. 76 through No. 164 on each of the land listed in the annexed Table 1 Compensation Table, owned by the Plaintiffs (i.e., the number of obstacles owned by the Plaintiffs No. 9 and the number of obstacles owned by the Plaintiff No. 40; hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land” and “the instant obstacles,” referring to each of the instant obstacles, and hereinafter referred to as “the instant objects subject to expropriation”): The date of expropriation: Compensation for losses on February 6, 2015: the same shall apply to the column for the amount of adjudication on expropriation in the annexed Table 1 compensation statement.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on June 25, 2015 - Contents of the ruling: The same shall apply to the statement in the “amount of the ruling” in the attached Table 1 compensation statement.

The result of the court's entrustment of appraisal to the appraiser J (hereinafter referred to as "court's appraisal") - Contents of appraisal: The same shall apply to the statement in the "amount of court's appraisal" in attached Form 1 compensation statement.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 9, 10, 16, 25 (including each number in the case of additional evidence)

2. Determination on the claim against the defendant Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant P&C is about the above target matter in the process of conducting the consultation procedure on the subject matter of confinement in this case.