Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00 on Jeju Island Co., Ltd., and (b) had a dispute with the victim D (n, 71 years of age) that was known at his house at his house at his house, and female issues; (c) took two-time actions on the part of the victim’s breast part of his chest; and (d) took two weeks of treatment for two weeks on the part of his female, and carried out a blue blue of blus.

2. Around 09:00 on September 29, 2012, the Defendant dumped the victim’s fatto the floor before the fat of the E Victim F (74 years of age) in Jeju, and dumpeded the victim’s fat to the floor, and dumped the victim’s dump to the dump, which requires four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness D;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Statutory mitigation under Articles 21(2) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act (in cases of the crime of injury under paragraph (1) at the time of sale, excessive defense);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion against the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion constituted self-defense because the defendant's knife knife of the victim's breast part of the victim's chest was forced because they want to knife and knife the victim's temporary border as indicated

In full view of the causes, developments, and circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the degree of infringement inflicted on the defendant by the victim, and the degree of injury inflicted on the victim in this case, the defendant's act is an excessive defense, which lacks reasonableness beyond the degree or conduct to protect the victim's unfair infringement.