logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.09.08 2016고단1239
조세범처벌법위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for 10 months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 50 million won.

2. Provided, That the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, “2016 Highest 1239,” operated B, a ship block producer, from February 2, 2012 to the end of February 2012, Defendant A, who was actually operated after being transferred E registered under D name at that time, and Defendant B, a corporation established for the purpose of vessel assembly and processing business.

No goods or services shall be supplied or supplied, and a list of total tax invoices by seller under the Value-Added Tax Act shall be submitted to the Government by entering it falsely.

1. Defendant A

A. (1) On July 25, 2012, the first defendant of the year 2012 submitted a final return of value-added tax base for E- 1 in Seosan Tax Office for the first time on July 25, 2012, and submitted to E a final return of value-added tax base for E- 2012, services equivalent to KRW 587,676,000 for supply price during the period from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012, notwithstanding the absence of the fact that he/she supplied goods or services to E, and submitted to E a final return of value-added tax base for each seller as if he/she issued a tax invoice under Chapter IV.

Accordingly, the Defendant did not supply goods or services, entered a false tax invoice for each seller, and submitted it to the government.

(2) On October 25, 2012, the Defendant submitted the 2012 Seosan Tax Office’s 2012 Value-Added Value-Added Value-Added Tax Return for E- 2012, and submitted the 327,260,000 won of supply price to E during the period from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012, notwithstanding the fact that he/she had not supplied goods or services to E, the Defendant supplied the 327,260,000 won of supply price to E and submitted a list of tax invoices by customer to Seosan Tax Office by preparing a list of tax invoices by customer as if he/she issued two tax invoices.

Accordingly, the Defendant did not supply goods or services, entered a false tax invoice for each seller, and submitted it to the government.

B. The Defendant, in the first half of 2012, submitted a list of total tax invoices by seller (1) on July 25, 2012.

arrow