Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around 04:30 on March 15, 2014, the Defendant, while drunk at the D convenience store located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, was under the influence of alcohol to prevent customers from entering the facility, hinging their desire, and sound to his employees, the Defendant, upon receiving a report, expressed that the police officer F, who belongs to the Gwangju Northern Police Station E zone of the Gwangju Northern Police Station E zone, called “I am home at the entrance of the business place. I am home at the entrance of the above convenience store, on the ground that I am bad, I am at the entrance of the above convenience store and expressed that “I am at the entrance of the business place, I am at the age, I am at the school, I am at the close of the above police officer, and interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the maintenance of public order and order by scambling down the bridge of the above police officer on two occasions with the left door.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act does not reach an agreement with the victim, and that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime after around 2009, the punishment as ordered shall be determined within the scope of the standard for sentencing for the instant crime (basic area: June - January 1st and April).