1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 21, 2010, the Plaintiff Simsan Forest Co., Ltd. concluded a contract with the owner of the land to solely or jointly own the land located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, H, and I, under which the contract was concluded between J, K, L, and M for the construction of the contract amount of KRW 1.39,215 million and the construction period from May 27, 2010 to December 30, 2010 to remove the Gu building on the said land and newly construct multi-household and neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “instant loan”).

B. On May 31, 2010, Plaintiff B entered into a subcontract on the construction amount of KRW 12 million (excluding value-added tax) and the construction period from May 31, 201 to July 31, 201, with respect to the instant loan facilities and fire-fighting works with the Plaintiff Ysan Forest Co., Ltd.

C. On May 31, 201, Plaintiff A entered into a subcontract with the Plaintiff Masan Forest Co., Ltd. to enter into an agreement with the Plaintiff for the construction cost of the interior works, including the 380 million construction cost, and the construction period from June 1, 2011 to December 20, 201, with respect to the interior works, such as the cryp, metal, light weight, wooden, and typ, etc. of the instant lending.

On March 3, 2012, the owner of the building, who was detained in the prosecution on the end of the end of March, 2012, terminated the instant construction contract with the Plaintiff Ysan Forest Co., Ltd. on the ground of the delay and suspension of construction work on the side of the Plaintiff Ysan Forest Co., Ltd., and changed the construction work to Ysan Forest Co., Ltd., and subsequently concluded a construction contract again with the construction company that entered into a subcontract with the Plaintiff Ysan Forest Co., Ltd., but did not conclude a re-contract with the Plaintiff A and B.

E. From May 2010 to March 30, 2012, the Plaintiffs occupied the instant Ba for the purpose of exercising the right of retention, etc. However, around March 30, 2012, J, including J, cut the locks corrected at the door door at the site, and enters the site of the instant construction.