logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.09.09 2016고단483
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 10, 2007, Defendant B sentenced Defendant B to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court, and four months of imprisonment, respectively, and was released on September 28, 2007 at the Chungcheong District Court on September 28, 2007 during the execution of the sentence and the parole period on November 9, 2007.

[Criminal facts]

1. On June 5, 2009, Defendant B and the Defendants entered into a contract to purchase an apartment house of KRW 175,000,000 (the buyer succeeds to the deposit money obligation of KRW 65,000) from the victim G to the purchase price of KRW 17,00,00,00 (the condition that the buyer succeeds to the deposit money of KRW 65,000) from the victim G at the F office located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant apartment house”) around KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000 from the victim G, with the payment of KRW 130,000,000 by offering apartment as security to the financial institution.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have confirmed whether the instant apartment as security was possible to lend KRW 130 million to the financial institution. Moreover, even if the Defendants borrowed money from the bond company as security, the Defendants planned to use the apartment as private by way of repaying the existing personal debt, etc. so that they did not have any intent or ability to pay the purchase price to the victim.

Nevertheless, on June 9, 2009, the Defendants, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, acquired the registration of transfer of ownership of the instant apartment in the name of the Defendant in the name of the victim.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.

"2016 Highest 100

2. On October 13, 2008, Defendant A’s fraud had no intent or ability to pay the price normally even if he/she received the goods from the injured party in the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government shop building located in Seodaemun-gu, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around October 13, 2008.

arrow