logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.21 2014가합506718
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: 42,049,31 won, Plaintiff B, C, and D respectively; 6,000,000 won, and 2,00,000,000 won, respectively, to Plaintiff E.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 21, 2012, at around 7:13, 2012, Plaintiff A driven a 1 ton truck owned by the said Plaintiff, passing through the 25th International Civilian Access Control Office, and went through I around 8:19, in order to bring the plate in the direction south of the instant accident site (hereinafter “the instant accident site”).

In addition, Plaintiff A re-entered into the instant accident site at around 13:00 on the same day through the I Civilian Access Control Office, and entered the instant accident site at around 13:00, and there was an accident in which mines explosion by undergoing Ma-14 large-scale mine (hereinafter “instant accident”), and Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as the left-hand ray cutting on the top-hand side.

B. The instant accident site is a place where the entry of a civilian is controlled as the north bank area of the Civilian Control Line (hereinafter “Private Road”). A person who sets up a farming house or engages in fishing in the north bank area of the private line is permitted only within the permitted area with the permission of the competent military unit. The Defendant A filed an application for permission to enter the competent military unit for fishery purposes and possessed a fishing pass with the fishing pass from March 20, 2008 to March 20, 2013, and was able to enter the north bank area of the private line through the first 25 group I.

C. The instant accident site was part of the 12 non-verification mine areas (1-G-7) managed by the first group 11 of the company, and at the time, the sum distance of the said 12 non-verification mine areas was approximately 82 km, and the distance from which the steel network was installed was 6.8km.

In the case of the accident site, there was a steel net of 337 meters indicating the mine area in the south of the mountain and its outer field, but there was no light-based sign for the area where the victim entered as the area because the steel net was damaged by approximately 132 meters in the middle part.

Plaintiff

B, C, and D are the children of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff E is the children of Plaintiff D.

arrow