beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.
Reasons
Criminal facts
The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a rocketing car.
On 18:45 on 07. 03. 07. 07., the Defendant driven the above vehicle as a duty, and turn to the left from the direction of the name C in the direction of the name of the road in front of the 575 Doldong Office, Dolldong-gu, Daegu.
In such cases, since traffic control is performed by a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with a signal at a place, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the new code.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to turn to the left without neglecting it, and conflict with the driving of the victim D(58 years old) 125cc, which would turn to the right normally from the left side of the vehicle under the new subparagraph, with the front part of the vehicle under the right side of the victim.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the scambling of the following bridge, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. Written statements of D;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. A medical certificate;
1. The Defendant denies the instant crime in a traffic accident analysis.
However, in full view of the above evidence and the motion picture images at the time of the instant case, the following facts and circumstances can be acknowledged, and the vehicle of the Defendant can be recognized as shocking the Defendant.
① The Defendant left the left at the time of a change in the signal, and the victim stopped the Defendant’s vehicle while getting on and off the Otoba, and the Defendant found and stopped the Defendant’s driver’s Otoba, and the Defendant started driving again by viewing the Defendant, and the Defendant was driving the Otoba, and the Defendant was faced with the Defendant’s vehicle while driving the Otoba, and the victim was able to recognize the facts of the resistance after stopping the Defendant’s vehicle.
(2)