1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff provided a vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) by borrowing money from the lending company as collateral. As the Plaintiff did not pay the money, the lending company transferred the instant vehicle to the Defendant on March 1, 2014.

The defendant is a person who actually controls and manages the operation of the motor vehicle of this case while keeping the motor vehicle of this case and is obligated to take over the transfer registration procedure of this case from the plaintiff.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to prove that the Defendant acquired the instant automobile from the lender.

(1) The Defendant: (a) received a request from the lending company to request the lending company to arrange for the transferee of the claim held by the Plaintiff; and (b) introduced the mother in Seoul; (c) claimed that he acquired the above claim, and that he acquired the instant automobile and did so while taking over the claim). Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim in this case is dismissed as it is without merit.