1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) was established for the purpose of wastewater treatment recycling business, etc. on August 6, 2002, and imported and sold printing equipment on January 15, 2004, which was added to each purpose on March 13, 2009, and Defendant C was the representative director on April 25, 2007, and Defendant D was appointed as the inside director on December 7, 2009.

B. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) was established mainly for the purpose of importing and selling printed materials on January 7, 2009, and the equipment rental business was added to its purpose on September 27, 201, and is the representative of Defendant C’s spouse as a director or internal director from the time of its establishment to the date of its establishment.

C. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for the refund of the purchase price with the Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2012Gahap2792 against the non-party company, stating that “Around October 2009, the Plaintiff purchased the printed output equipment from the non-party company and the non-party company to purchase it again within two years, and accordingly, the non-party company agreed to purchase it again, and accordingly requested the non-party company to purchase it again on September 28, 201, the non-party company is obligated to pay the purchase price to the Plaintiff.” On December 6, 2012, the above court rendered a judgment that “A non-party company shall pay 150,000,000 won to the Plaintiff and delay damages therefor,” and the above judgment became final and conclusive at that time.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. Claimant: (a) In-house director who is the representative of the Defendant Company, Defendant D and the representative director of the Nonparty Company, are married with Defendant C; (b) both companies are in accord with the head office; (c) both companies are identical to (printed) equipment rental business; and (c) there was no transaction between the Nonparty Company and the equipment rental-related transaction partner from around 201, which was difficult to finance the Nonparty Company.