Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
When the defendant does not pay a fine, 10,000 won shall be converted into one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 25, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for rape injury by the Busan High Court, and on April 25, 2013, the Defendant was issued an order to attach an electronic tracking device for five years from the support of the Southern District Court to the Southern District Court on April 25, 2013, and on May 13, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for special injury and two years of suspended execution and became final and conclusive on May 21, 2016.
1. On July 16, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the use of electronic device: (a) around 03:00, the Defendant was unable to track the position of the center for protection and observation for 12 minutes on the wind, where the location tracking center failed to charge the electronic device, even if the location tracking device’s electric warning was issued six times by the central control center; and (b) the Defendant was ordered to charge the electronic tracking device more than six times.
In addition, from that time until July 4, 2015, the Defendant maintained its utility during the period of attachment of an electronic device four times in total, as shown in the attached Table 1 to 4, as well as from that time until July 4, 2015.
2. On May 29, 2015, the Defendant did not return home to Ulsan-dong C, a residence reported to the protective observation office around July 3, 2015, even though the U.S. District Court added to the matters to be observed in the attachment order of electronic tracking devices “from 00:00 to 05:00 each day for six months to the competent protective observation office, not going out of the place of residence,” the Defendant did not return home to the Ulsan-dong C, a residence of which was reported to the protective observation office in advance on July 3, 2015.
From July 23, 2015 to July 24:00, the Defendant violated the code of practice, without justifiable grounds, at least three times in total, as shown in the list of offenses Nos. 5 to 7.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A processing ledger, including a written command to execute each attachment order, a log of protection observation, and a risk alert for tracking locations;
1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, reporting on the results of confirmation of the previous conviction before and after the disposition, reporting on the investigation (verification of the judgment), and the application of the text of the Act and subordinate statutes of the Ulsan District Court 2016 Height482;
1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;