Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant agreed to obtain a loan from a lending company under the name of the Defendant and to obtain a loan in the name of the Defendant, but thereafter, B did not repay the loan and filed a lawsuit against the Defendant against the said lending company, and the said lending company filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, the Defendant’s office located in the Defendant’s office located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul, on September 11, 2013, for the purpose of avoiding its responsibility and having B be subject to criminal punishment. On September 11, 2013, the Defendant filed a false complaint against B with the Defendant’s office with the purport of having B be subject to criminal punishment. The Defendant filed a comprehensive complaint against B, “The Defendant’s office, in the name of the Defendant Party B, borrowed KRW 3 million each from Busan and Pluxex, and KRW 6 million each from the Defendant’s office with the total amount of KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, which was punished as a crime of forging private document.”
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. B oral statements in the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution against B and A;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to filing a complaint, an application for loans, and a debt certificate certificate;
1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;
1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 6 (Confession) of the Criminal Act, which are statutory mitigation;
1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).
1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a crime that causes unnecessary waste of human resources of a criminal justice agency and is likely to exercise the wrong state punishment right against the intent to evade, and there is a need to strictly punish the person under consideration in the motive of the crime, the fact that the person under consideration is a child of friendship, the first offender, the fact that the person under consideration is a first offender, the fact that the person under consideration is recognized and against others, and the defendant's age, character, conduct, environment, and the crime of this case.