Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant filed a false report in a manner that does not receive a telephone from police officers who reported commercial sex acts in the “C” located in the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government B Building, despite the absence of commercial sex acts, so that commercial sex acts occur.

Accordingly, the Defendant reported the criminal facts that did not exist to the public official by falsity.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2016. 3. 10. 03:50 경 제 1 항의 장소에서 약 3시간 동안 고성을 지르며 소란을 피운다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 인천 서부 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 경위 E으로부터 경범죄 처벌법위반 업무 방해 통고 처분을 받게 되자, 이에 화가 나 “ 개새끼, 성매매 단속도 못하는 것 들이 ”라고 욕설을 하며 주먹으로 위 E을 때리려는 시늉을 하고, 양손으로 위 E의 멱살을 잡고 흔드는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Notice of the department related to the report of 112 case and the list of reported cases processing;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (case of false report of suspect);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the selection of fines) concerning the crime, and Article 3 (3) 2 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of false report, the selection of fines) concerning the punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant reported false facts to 112, and that it interfere with the execution of official duties by assaulting the police officer dispatched.

However, the fact that the defendant recognizes his mistake and reflects it, and exceeds the punishment records and fines due to the same crime.