The accused shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment of innocence against the accused.

1. On April 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) drive a small river located in 38 U.S. 07:45 U.S. in front of 201, U.S. 201, U.S. 112 patrol vehicles without any justifiable reason; (b) placed D’s driving seat window, a police officer belonging to C District Unit in the Mine-gu Police Station C District of the Mine-gu Police Station, a police officer in charge of patrol, making a drinking; and (c) asked the Defendant whether the said D is a son’s driver; (d) whether the Defendant “d’s seat and watched due to d’s d’;

why is bullying;

The Defendant was able to go to E, who is a police officer belonging to the same district group, and the Defendant was fluored by the fluorial hand, thereby interfering with the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties concerning the patrol of the police officer.

2. The crime of obstructing the performance of official duties is established by assaulting or threatening a public official in the performance of his duties. The assault at this time refers to an act of exercising the illegal tangible power against a public official, which directly or indirectly, or without restraint, and intimidation means any notice of harm and injury that may cause fear to the other party. However, the assault or intimidation is against a public official performing his duties by nature and should interfere with the performance of his duties (see Supreme Court Decision 2006Do9020, Mar. 16, 2007, etc.). According to the evidence examined by the court (refer to Supreme Court Decision 2006Do9020, Mar. 16, 2007, etc.). According to the evidence examined by the court, it is difficult to view that the defendant was a public official in the course of carrying out his duties even after the police officer carrying out the patrol, and then the police officer was in a way to interfere with the police officer's exercise of force.

3, 3.