logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.08 2015누32751
관리처분계획 고시처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part concerning the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance which rejected the lawsuit of this case is justifiable.

(B) Under the premise that the Plaintiff has a legal interest in seeking the revocation of the instant disposition, even if considering the health expenses and all the circumstances alleged by the Plaintiff, the instant disposition is not carried out at all or omitted matters to be included in the subject of the consideration of the balancing of interests, or it cannot be deemed that it lacks legitimacy and objectivity even though the balancing of interests was carried out. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit).

arrow