A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2007, the defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on April 24, 2008 and completed the execution of the sentence.

1. On July 8, 2010, at around 12:25, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluoring to take a drinking level), even though there are reasonable grounds to recognize that he/she driven under the influence of alcohol, such as driving a cpoter freight vehicle on the alley side of the old U.S. High School located in the Gu, U.S.A.A., and taking a bath to another vehicle, and he/she did not comply with a police officer’s request for the measurement of drinking, without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was requested by the police officer to comply with the request for the measurement of drinking, by inserting approximately 30 minutes into a drinking measuring instrument four minutes after the police box of the old U.S. police station is affiliated with the police station.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving Category C cargo vehicles in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act.

On August 10, 2010, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol of 0.118% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.10%, and led the front of the old and American kindergarten in the Gu and the Gu to the direction of the flow from the fluence of salary.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to stop in accordance with the signals by checking the front door and signal etc. in good faith for those engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently driven by the victim F (the age of 27) who was in the air traffic signal at the front of the cargo vehicle in the above breath of the passenger vehicle, which was driven by the victim F (the age of 27) who was in the air traffic at the above breath of the cargo vehicle. The lower part of the G blap vehicle was driven by the front part of the said cargo vehicle, and the lower part of the flap vehicle was driven by the victim H (the age of 52) who was in the atmosphere of the above blap vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational duties.