A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 16:30 on December 29, 2014, the victim D (year 51) located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stated that “On the front side of the street, the victim thought that he was able to take care of his personnel on the front side, on the front side, the victim was able to take care of his personnel on the dong residents; and (b) Dogs (70 cm in length, 15 cm in length on the day, 15 cm in width on the day, 6 cm in width on the day) which are dangerous things in the house, and Dogs around the above restaurant entrance, the Defendant laid the gate on the floor, and said Dogs “I am, I am, I am am s

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. The scene of damage, victims, and photographs of criminal tools;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of inflicting bodily injury on a victim;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Education [Scope of Recommendation] In the case where the mitigation area (including a person who has been subject to special mitigation for a period of four to one year), the mitigation area (including a serious effort to recover damage) or considerable part of damage (the decision of sentence] of the crime of this case committed the crime of this case under the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, or the fact that the victim received the defendant's apology and did not want to punish the defendant, the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case by contingency, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case. In addition, the motive and background of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., and the records and arguments of this case are shown.