A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:10 on March 19, 2019, the Defendant: (a) went off the post of a person who was urged to return to the Republic of Korea during the process of a reported return case by voluntarily accompanying the said district and the slope E belonging to the C District called, “a person who was sent to the Republic of Korea by the Defendant without paying a fare or charge,” and assaulted, in his hand, the E, “a person who was forced to return to the Republic of Korea from the upper non-military forces, must have a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a taxi.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the E 112 Reporting Cases, a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A detailed statement of 112 reports;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and damaged photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The punishment as indicated in the order shall be determined by the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, taking into consideration the following: (a) the criminal defendant's use of violence against a police officer in the course of performing official duties is not deemed to be bad; (b) the degree of the criminal defendant's use of violence against a police officer is not minor; (c) the criminal defendant is against the criminal defendant; (d) the criminal defendant has no power