1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against each of the plaintiffs, which orders payment below.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts of recognition are the same as the entry of "1. Basic Facts" among the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. The Plaintiffs’ assertion 1) On November 24, 2014, the Defendant concluded a sales contract with the Nonparty Company on behalf of the Defendant on behalf of the Defendant on the land of the said Party, and concluded a sales contract with the Nonparty Company on behalf of the Defendant on behalf of the said company, and received certain fees from the Defendant on behalf of the said company (hereinafter “instant contract”).

(2) On July 2, 2015, the Defendant concluded a contract on July 2, 2015 with a view to evading the payment of the collection amount, and the Defendant’s exercise of the purchase price is the same gold Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “gold Construction”).

(2) On June 25, 2015, the date of the instant collection order, which is contrary to the good faith principle, the Defendant changed to the sale order, and thus, the aggregate of KRW 517,856,000,00,000, which was paid to the gold Construction after June 25, 2015, should be paid to the Plaintiffs according to the instant collection order (i.e., the head of the order). The non-party company sold the shares as shown in the attached Table by June 16, 2015, and accordingly, the sum of the sales commission to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs is as shown in the attached Table 106,220,00 won, which is the aggregate of the sales commission to be paid by the Defendant. Accordingly, the “125,30,000,000 won” appears to be “125,000 won,” and “25,30,000 won” of the total sales commission to be paid by the Defendant.

There are South Korea

(2) ②. 3 Accordingly, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiffs, a collection creditor, the amount of KRW 50 million, which corresponds to part of the amount of the plaintiffs' claims, from among the sales agency fees to be paid by the non-party company.

B. The instant contract between the Defendant’s assertion and the Nonparty Company was concluded on May 31, 2015, and the sales agency fee incurred until this time was issued on June 6, 2015, prior to the delivery of the instant collection order.