1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on May 23, 2017 by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on the case No. 5309 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 16, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a petition for a trial to invalidate the Plaintiff’s patent on the grounds that the patent invention in the instant case is new and non-obviousness denied by prior inventions 1 and 2 (No. 2015Da5309) (No. 2) on January 23, 2015, the Intellectual Property Tribunal dismissed the Plaintiff’s petition for a trial to invalidate the patent invention on the grounds that “the patent invention in this case is not denied by prior inventions 1 and 2.”

B. The name of the Defendant’s patented invention (No. 2) invention of this case: C2) filing date/registration date/F 3) claims 【 Claim 1】 The registration gazette of this case is indicated as “responding,” but it is written to “fluoring” in accordance with the D/ E/F 3; hereinafter the same shall apply. The above inside and outside can be separated from the outside of the joints with the inside and outside of the joints, and the joints of the above joints can be separated from the outside, so that the joints of the patented invention of this case (No. 2) can be cleaned as fully exposed to the outside of the joints, and the joints of the patented invention of this case (see, e.g., “0 parts of the patented invention of this case”) can be removed from the joints of the joints of the joints of the outers of the joints of the joints of this case (see, e., e., e., e., see the parts of the joints of the joints of this case (2).).