beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 21, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on June 22, 2009, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on February 14, 2013, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months by imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act.
1. On September 10, 2015, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice, and driven a Chand motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with approximately KRW 0.296% alcohol concentration from the 7km section to the front road in front of Sinsan-si’s front of the cross-defence in the seat of the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, to the front road in front of Sinsan-si.
2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person who is engaged in driving motor vehicles with C
The Defendant, at around 23:20 on September 10, 2015, is under the influence of alcohol on a blood alcohol level of 0.296%, and the blood color is red and red, and the walking distance is difficult to drive normally, and the Defendant is driving the said vehicle on a three-lane road in front of B in front of the city interesting and driving the said vehicle to the view for viewing from the head of the Jeju Jeju Island.
The suspension was suspended.
At this point, the vehicle to make a right-hand is entering the back of the defendant's right-hand side, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front, rear and right-hand side and operating the steering system.
Nevertheless, the defendant's negligence, which was under the influence of alcohol, is due to the negligence of the defendant, and the victim D, who was trying to make a right-to-face from the back king Station, to the view of the city show-to-face.