logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2017.11.10 2017가합229
약정금 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B shall be KRW 240,000,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from May 19, 2017 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Agreement between D and the defendant (Purpose of Contract)

A. D The purpose of this loan is to secure the performance of the obligation to return the above loan in determining and lending 160,000,000 won to Defendant B on December 5, 2007 as interest rate of 5% per annum (60% per annum) and as of March 5, 2008.

B. If Defendant B is unable to pay the above amount to D by the due date, the construction work among the new construction works of “G apartment building” constructed on the “F and fifteen lots” under a contract with Defendant B Co., Ltd., and the above apartment building Nos. 102, 109, 102, 110, 111, 102, 102, 112, 112, 102, 102, and 112 of the above apartment building (hereinafter “the whole apartment of this case”) is stated as Defendant B in the agreement of this case, but the agreement of this case is different.

In light of the description of the claim, it seems that the defendant B is not the defendant B but D.

shall comply with the procedures for the transfer registration of ownership.

C. If the defendant B did not pay the above amount to D by the above date, the above amount shall also be paid.

If the registration of transfer of ownership under this subsection is not made, the amount of the obligation to be paid by Defendant B to Defendant D shall be KRW 240,000,000.

Provided, That interest accrued on and after the above date shall continue to accrue.

1) On December 5, 2007, D and Defendant B entered into an agreement with the following contents (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(2) Defendant B concluded the instant agreement with the Plaintiff.

The loan obligation amounting to KRW 160,000,000, as stated in the subsection, was not repaid until March 5, 2008, when the repayment period was due, and the obligation to transfer ownership to the whole apartment of this case was not fulfilled.

B. Defendant C, who is the representative director of Defendant C’s issuance of bills and preparation of notarial deed, is jointly and severally with Defendant B, as of May 13, 2008, KRW 190,000 out of the instant agreed amount bonds against Defendant D.

arrow