1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s primary claim is dismissed.

2. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) added to the Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a person with a second degree disability of brain disease, and the defendant is a person who operates a sales store of disabled goods "D" in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

B. From December 17, 2013 to March 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) lent the Plaintiff a monthly rent of KRW 100,000,000 to the Plaintiff; (b) while the Plaintiff was employed, there was a repair cost of KRW 1.2 million.

C. On February 4, 2014, the Plaintiff received “KP-31 wheelchairs” from the State without compensation. D. The Plaintiff received “KP-31 wheelchairs.”

On April 1, 2014, the Defendant leased the monthly rent of KRW 200,000 to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the instant scooter”) by changing it into “cooter”.

However, while the Plaintiff used it, there was a repair cost of KRW 1,580,000 due to the damage of the front and rear part of the Plaintiff.

E. At around 20:00 on July 1, 2014, the Defendant brought about the instant scooter in front of the Plaintiff’s house, and had large 589 scooter for the use of the Plaintiff.

F. On July 2, 2014, the Plaintiff found the Defendant’s shop at around 17:00, thereby bringing about the Defendant and the scooter of this case, and disputing the rent, repair cost, etc., the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the 2 scood cood cood coo, etc.

With respect to the act of bringing the scoo in this case without the Plaintiff’s consent, the Defendant was charged with summary punishment of KRW 300,000 for obstruction of exercise of right and received a summary order of KRW 300,000 for fines. On the act of assaulting the Plaintiff who was found in the Defendant’s shop, the Defendant was charged with summary punishment of KRW 16031 and received a summary order of KRW 3 million for a fine of KRW 200,000 for the same court.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 5, 6, 8 evidence, Eul 1 through 7 (including additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. On February 4, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that he purchased the instant scooter from the Defendant and used it in KRW 2.8.6 million, and the Defendant.