The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the gist of the grounds for appeal, the extent of damage caused by the instant traffic accident is relatively minor, and the victim's punishment is not imposed by agreement with the victims, etc., the punishment of the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant, even though the Defendant did not obtain a driver's license, and was driven by the victim D while driving a motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle without being able to find tobacco properly, and was in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim D, and there is no reason to view that the Defendant again sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor and/or imprisonment with prison labor, two times more than six times after the completion of the crime, and there is no reason to view that the Defendant again sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor and/or imprisonment with prison labor, two times more, more than two weeks of treatment to the same passenger E, and there is no reason to view that the Defendant again sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor and/or imprisonment with prison labor, three times more, more than six, more than two weeks of treatment for the same passenger E during the crime, and there is no reason to view that the Defendant again sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor and/or imprisonment with prison labor to the same passenger G during the crime of violation of the Act.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.