(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고합625

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고합625

특수강도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was willing to take the taxi by threatening the taxi engineer after having gotten the taxi as a guest.

around 01:00 on October 25, 2015, the Defendant operated the Victim F (59 years of age) in front of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu.

GYF small-scale taxi as a guest, and at around 01:55 on the same day, the Defendant said that “I will enter the house to bring the card” to the Defendant’s house located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu.

The Defendant, entering the house, brought a knife knife (21.5cm in knife, 35cm in knife) which is a deadly weapon in custody at the same place, brought it into the house, presented several pages of cards that are not approved as if the Defendant would be on board the knife and pay the knife to the victim, and displayed the knife knife knife knife to the victim, and led the victim to get off the knife at the above knife, and let the victim get off the knife at the above knife, and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

2. Around October 25, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act against the victim D (in the event of an accident) on October 25, 2015, the Defendant was driving a Bana car, a taxi, which was a taxi taken by force as above, in the course of performing his/her duties, leading the Defendant to the first road in the Yeongdeungpo-gu, Youngwon-gu.

In such a case, despite the occupational duty of care to prevent accidents by driving on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and right part of the JJ car owned by the victim D, which was parked on the street while neglecting the duty of care to prevent accidents by driving on the right and the right and the right part of the car was received as the front part of the other car.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s aforementioned negligence in the course of performing his duties, thereby repairing the said car 4.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2013.02.21 2012고정2009

-청주지법 2007. 5. 31. 선고 2007고합43 판결

-수원지방법원 2012.11.14 2012고합823

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.11.03 2014고정1012

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.05.14 2019고합20