logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.08.16 2017가단230256
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shared KRW 30,000,000 for each of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and each of them on September 2017.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs are married couple, and the defendants are married couple with 1/2 shares in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E apartment and F (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

B. On June 2, 2017, the Plaintiffs entered into a sales contract with the Defendant C as a broker of G licensed real estate agents for the sale of the instant apartment owned by the Defendants with KRW 600 million (a contract deposit of KRW 60 million). However, the Plaintiffs entered into a sales contract with the Defendant C with the purchase price of KRW 570 million (a contract deposit of KRW 30 million) in the form of the contract. The main contents are as follows. At the time, the Defendant C puts the seal affixed on the Defendant D’s name. Article 1 of the content of the contract of this case / [Purpose] The seller and the buyer agreed to pay the purchase price as follows. The seller and the buyer are liable for the remainder of the contract payment of KRW 570,000 (a contract deposit of KRW 60,000) to the seller, and the buyer may not claim for the remainder of the contract payment of KRW 570,000,000,000 to the seller before the contract was terminated.

- By the date of balance;

arrow