logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.03.21 2018누66434
정직처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged in the court of first instance by the Plaintiff for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is re-

Therefore, the reasons for this case are as follows: “The court did not conduct the first instance court’s 7th sentence 5” (as alleged by the Plaintiff, KRW 4.6 times the sales commission for the year 2013 increased to approximately 3.5 times the previous year, and at the same time, the sales commission for the year 2013 increased to approximately 3.5 times the total sales commission for the year 2013 may be deemed to have increased to a considerable amount of the sales commission or the sales commission ratio compared to the amount of the sales commission for the year 2013),” and “C did not pay the above sales commission for the year 2013” in the 7th sentence.

arrow