beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A’s KRW 47,92,696 and for this, KRW 5% per annum from May 23, 2012 to December 26, 2014.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition (1) around 22:25 May 2012, Defendant A driven a car insurance contract (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) of the Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) with B automobiles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) that were subscribed to the automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) of the Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) and neglected to perform the duty of Jeonyang-dong, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul to five-lanes of the five-lane road (free road) near the 771-lane road in the city of Goyangyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul, by negligence changing the five-lane lanes from the front to the four-lane road at the front. As a result, Defendant A received the front part of the lower right side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”) from the left side of the Plaintiff vehicle, thereby getting the latter part of the E vehicle under way.
(2) At the time of the instant accident, the owner of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was a IMB wave Korea Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”). On October 17, 2012, Nonparty Company sold the Plaintiff’s vehicle to the Plaintiff. In addition, on the same day, Nonparty Company transferred the right to claim damages against the Defendants arising from the instant accident to the Plaintiff on November 27, 2014, and notified the Defendants of the purport of the said transfer of claim.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 7 through 10, 20, 21, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant company is the insurer of the defendant vehicle, and the defendant A is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident in this case as an illegal act.
C. The Defendants’ determination as to the Defendants’ assertion on limitation of liability shall be from three to four lanes while Defendant A was in progress at the time of the instant accident with four lanes from five to four lanes.