logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.08.08 2016고정90
낚시관리및육성법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of the fishing vessel B (4.99 tons) and the captain of the fishing vessel in the Goung-gun.

No fishing business operator shall refuse or evade an order to restrict the business area ordered by the military, as deemed especially necessary to ensure the safety of fishing vessels and prevent accidents, and to maintain order in the fishing industry.

Nevertheless, on November 21, 2015, from around 06:10 to around 11:00, the Defendant avoided the Defendant’s order to restrict the business territory of the fishing vessel issued to the head of Goung-gun by leaving one fisher on the walth of the walth in the walth of the Yan-gun and the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the walth of the Republic of

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation (in relation to attachment of a written statement by B captain A, etc.), report on internal investigation (in relation to attachment of photographs by field), and report on internal investigation (in relation to confirmation of an area, etc. subject to restrictions on the operation of fishing vessels

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 53(2)8 and 35(1)2 of the Act on the Management and Promotion of Live Fishing of Punishment for the Criminal Facts (the Defendant was sentenced to a penalty punishment and a fine of four times for the same kind of crime) and the Defendant was detained in the police on September 9, 2015 and was under investigation on the charge of getting the guests from the same line of crime (the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1 million for the criminal facts of the above case (the investigation record is 59 pages, 60 pages), taking into account the fact that the Defendant again committed the crime of this case, taking into account the fact that he/she again committed the crime of this case).

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow