A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 20, 201, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of 2.5 million won by committing a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jung-gu District Court on May 20, 201, and on July 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of 10 months by committing a crime of the Road Traffic Act at the Jung-gu District Court on July 20, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence on May 18, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

On March 15, 2015, at around 13:20 on March 15, 2015, the Defendant driven C C-man car in the state of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.068% from the road before the Office of Education of the East-gu Office of Education in front of the same City Action Bank to the road before the same City Action Bank.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual status of a host driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. A witness's statement in the preparation of a bamera decoration;

1. A case of checking CCTV at the place of control over the marching basin;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation records, investigation reports (former records and attachment reports of judgment);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 (C) of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had been punished several times, including imprisonment for the same kind of crime, during the period of repeated crime even though he/she had been punished several times, and the blood alcohol concentration is relatively low; however, according to the Defendant’s driving behavior, words and behavior, and walking conditions at the time when he/she set up a vehicle on the road, etc., the Defendant appears to have been under the influence of alcohol, and the latter circumstances after the commission of the crime are also not good.

However, it is necessary to support the baby who is suffering from brain crypary afterma while not driving under the influence of alcohol.