Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B, around 12:00 on November 8, 201, the He thought that the victim A(54 years of age) was bullying around the surrounding people in Goyang-gu Sungdong-dong Sungyang-gu Sungdong-dong-dong-dong 15, and caused the victim's injury, such as dump dump, etc., requiring treatment for about 14 days, considering that the victim's complaint was raised and the victim's face was hump and sumped.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect A by the prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. Defendant A, at around 12:00 on November 8, 201, suffered injury, such as chest feas, which requires treatment for about 21 days, due to knee, knenee, and feee and feas, when the victim B (the age of 69) exercised violence as described in the above facts of crime, in the Goyang-gu Sungdong-dong 15, Goyang-gu, Seongdong-gu.

2. As to the above facts charged, Defendant A denies the purport that the police, the prosecution, and the court consistently, and that he was unilaterally abused from B, and that he was not able to use the violence against B. On the other hand, Defendant B, G’s investigation agency, and the court as evidence for submission of the prosecutor who seems to correspond to the above facts charged, may make each statement and written diagnosis of injury against B in the investigation agency and the court.

However, in light of the following circumstances, each of the statements of witness H and F and the health insurance medical care benefit content of health insurance for B, etc., it is possible to confirm by the public trial and records, and each of the statements in B, investigation agencies of G, and the court to the effect that Defendant A was knee, knenee, and feeng B’s chest and frighte at a time, and that each statement in the investigation agency of B, and in the court of justice, it is difficult to believe this, and the content of the injury diagnosis report in relation to B is also likely to believe this part of the