Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 10,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

around 2013, the Defendants came to know of the fact that Defendant A borrowed money from Defendant B that Defendant A would engage in a credit business.

Defendant

B, around January 2015, in order to obtain a request from Defendant A to lend KRW 40 million to Defendant A, the Defendant leased the imported vehicle to Defendant A and then proposed to lend KRW 40 million on the face of the transfer, and the Defendant A consented thereto.

After the public invitation as above, the Defendants concluded a lease contract for the victim (i.e., non-M. S. S. S. S. S. S.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.s.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and embezzled the 80 million won car owned by the victim company (at the market price of 80 million won).

“2016 Highest 1088”: Defendant A is a person who operated K Haakwon in Daejeon-gu J building 106, and the victim L is a person who operates M in the name of “M” on the side of the above Maakwon.

On June 15, 2014, the Defendant found the “M” of the said victim, and concluded that “The current operating fund of the Ansanwon would be repaid if it is lent KRW 60 million.” If the operation of the Ansanwon is difficult, the Defendant would sell the land in the territory of thecheon or the apartment house owned within the Daejeon nature and would be repaid by selling it, and even if it is disposed of of the Ansanwon, he would be repaid.”

However, at the time, the defendant received the above money from the victim because he borrowed 60 million won from B by the bond company B.