Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that between April 7, 2020 and around 21:58, the Defendant, on the road in front of the C cafeteria located in the former Northern-gun B, the Defendant, upon receiving a report, expressed the victim’s situation, E, F, and patrolman, who is a police officer affiliated with the Haan Police Station D police box called the said cafeteria, he was aware of how he was aware of, and how he was aware of, about 28 minutes of the charge, such as “Ig, Ig ing, Ig ing, Ig ing, Ig ing, Ig ring, Ig ring, Ig ring, and Ig ring.”
Accordingly, the defendant publicly insultingd the victims.
2. Provisions of applicable provisions to the facts charged in judgment: Cases subject to prosecution under Article 311 of the Criminal Act: Requests for cancellation of complaint filed by the victims on June 25, 2020, which are subsequent to prosecution under Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act. Judgment dismissing prosecution is rendered: Subparagraph 5 of Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act (where a complaint is revoked with respect to cases for which a crime is to be prosecuted