logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.05.21 2014노6866
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the prosecutor's appeal (e.g., the crime of this case) is significant that the defendant committed an injury for about 8 weeks to his/her former female-born woman by taking about 5-6 times the head, face, etc. of the victim who was sexually sexually friendly in his/her former female-born district using a cirrepted wooden net, which is a dangerous object ( approximately 30cm in length), and the crime of this case was committed on April 26, 2013 by the head of the Si/Gun/Gu office in the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office located in Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office, who was sentenced to suspension of indictment on April 26, 2013, and the crime was committed since 1 year has not passed since 8 million won was merely an amount of damage in civil procedure, and it is difficult to view that the damage to the victim was properly suffered. In light of the fact that there is a need for an appropriate sentence to prevent recidivism and to correct the defendant's rehabilitation, the sentence of imprisonment of this case is too unfair.

2. In light of the motive and background of the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the character and conduct of the Defendant, and the environment, the lower court’s sentence is not deemed unreasonable, even if considering all the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal, given that there is no history of criminal punishment, the Defendant deposited KRW 8 million for the victim at the lower court, and the victim expressed his intent that he does not want the punishment of the Defendant at the time of the trial. In so doing, the aforementioned assertion is without merit, since it is not determined that the sentence of the lower court is unreasonable, considering all the circumstances alleged

3. The prosecutor’s appeal of conclusion is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that there is no ground for appeal by the prosecutor.

arrow