logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.04.26 2017고단3888
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around October 11, 2017, employed a disguised employment as if he/she had worked as Aarbrate at E convenience stores operated by the victim D in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., as of October 11, 2017. On the same day, around 19:18, the victim taken the keys to the Sabane at the bottom of the Kabter by using the gap in the Kabter.

50,000 won in cash owned by the injured party after opening a door of the depository that was next to it; and

I am back to my own land, and then am back to the victim as soon as he am soon as possible.

It means that it was stolen in a way that it was missing convenience points.

"2017 Highest 4127"

1. On October 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) taken a disguised employment for the purpose of theft of property at the H convenience store in the operation of the Victim G in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun; (b) subsequently, on October 4, 2017, at around 00:25, the Defendant stolen cash worth 531,000, which was kept in custody at the above convenience store for the said convenience store.

2. On October 11, 2017, the Defendant was engaged in disguised employment for the purpose of theft of property at the convenience store operated by the victim J in Ulsan-gu I, Ulsan-gu, with cash worth of KRW 562,00,000, which was kept in a safe of the 19:10 on the same day.

3. On October 13, 2017, the Defendant was employed in a disguised manner for the purpose of theft of property at the convenience points in the operation of the victim M in Ulsan-gun L, Ulsan-gun, and subsequently stolen cash amounting to KRW 900,000, which was kept in a safe of the Kitter on October 14, 2017, following the date.

On October 1, 2017, the Defendant: “A mobile phone sales chain operated by the victim P in Yangsan-si Co., Ltd. on October 1, 2017, the Defendant prepared a mobile subscription application to the Defendant, stating that “A mobile phone sales chain operated by the victim P in Yangsan-si, is a nurse who works in the RG in the vicinity of this area, and that a mobile phone is leased for temporary use until the mobile phone is opened through the new opening of the mobile phone.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not a nurse of the R hospital, and it is impossible to open new cell phone fees due to the failure to pay the existing mobile phone fees.

arrow