The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (two months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. There are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the judgment defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected the instant crime, and that the Defendant agreed with the victim smoothly.

However, the crime of this case committed by the Defendant is a so-called “phishing,” which is organized, planned, intelligent, and intelligent, and has a serious adverse effect on society as a whole by massing a large number of unspecified victims, and thus, its nature is extremely poor. The Defendant was in charge of withdrawing from the above phishing crime. The Defendant voluntarily participated in the phishing crime, and the Defendant took full account of the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, criminal record, criminal record, details of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.