logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.06.12 2013고단532
특수절도
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and by imprisonment with prison labor for nine months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 10, 2013, Defendant A and Defendant B conspired with each other to commit a “day-to-day” crime against women who walked in the near the F market located in Seopopo-si E at Seopo-si, Seopo-si, with the intention of committing a “day-to-day” crime. Defendant A and Defendant B returned to search for the subject of a “day-to-day” crime for approximately two hours.

At around 04:00 on the same day, the Defendants discovered the victim H in front of the “G” road located in Seopopopo City E, and Defendant B reported the neighboring network, and Defendant A escaped with the victim with a 150,000 won in cash used by the victim in his hand, a cellular phone (gal juS2), one credit card, one physical card, one resident registration certificate, and one handbag in the market value of 30,000 won in the market value of 108,000 won in the market value.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

2. At around 01:00 on April 30, 2013, the Defendants conspired with each other to commit a “Japanese” crime under the name of the Iski in Seopo-si E, Seopo-si, and sought approximately two hours of committing the crime.

At around 04:05 on the same day, the Defendants: (a) discovered the Victim K and 100 meters away from the front line of the “J” located in Seopopoposi E; (b) reported the victim by following the victim; (c) and (d) again, the Defendant Company A went to go to the alley, leading the victim to the victim; and (b) went to the victim by entering the alley, and (c) went to the victim, the Defendant Da Da 1.4 million won in cash, and 500,000,000 won in cash, which the market price was 200,000,000,000,000 won in cash, and one copy of the Samsung Card, and one copy of the NA card.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to K and H;

1. Each protocol of seizure, list of seizure and photograph of each seized article;

1. The investigation report (steveifies);

1. The victim of the investigation report;

arrow